Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Azar LeBlanc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Azar LeBlanc

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable author, article tagged with {{notability}} since december 2007. (Can't find the books mentioned when searching the Library of Congress website, but not sure if everything is available online.[1]) Bjelleklang - talk 18:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I cleaned up the bibliography a bit. There is a hit at LOC for her, but only for Theology 101. Most (but not all) of her work is vanity or self-published. There is evidence of some significant third-party review. Faustus37 (talk) 00:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All of her books are self-published (WestBow Press is the self-publishing arm of Thomas Nelson). She won a 2011 International Book Award, but that is a "pay to win" award where you pay $70 per category to enter and they have so many categories and sub-categories and runner ups etc.. it's not a big deal to win (marketing scheme for self published authors). She has two professional reviews which is significant, but not enough to establish notability. If someone can find 4 or 5 reviews I might change my position. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Faustus37. TBr and ley 03:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 03:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per User:Green Cardamom. There is mention of the subject winning the 2008 National Book Awards but it doesn't appear to be these awards, which would be clearly notable, but rather a 2008 INDIE National Book Award, which aim at "the heroes of indie and self-publishing". I'm not seeing enough clearly independent sourcing to meet WP:AUTHOR. AllyD (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete failing WP:AUTHOR. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.